December 03, 2004

New name nemesis

A decision about a singular name, The complainant failed to prove that the respondent's main business was to try to sell this name.
Eventually, the panel wrote: "... because the Respondent did not know that NNN corresponded to the specific trademark of the Complainant and was essentially "just shooting in the dark," the Panel finds that the Complainant has not proven the third part of the test of the Policy."

No comments: