I do not believe the Labour Party have registered these websites in Mr. Howard's name in order to sell them back to him. That would be bad enough. Is the plan, therefore, to misrepresent Mr. Howard?"Do you really think it would be the reason why MichaelHowardMP.org, MichaelHowardMP.net and MichaelHowardMP.org.uk were registered in the name of the Labour Party?
[Yahoo! New UK & Ireland, Conservatives accuse Labour party of dirty tricks in cyberspace]
UPDATE [Oct. 2]: "A spokesman for the Lapour Party said it did own the URLs which were to be used to "highlight Mr Howard's record in Government"" (The Register).